Name Association

Paris- Eiffel Tower

New York- Statue of Liberty

London- Big Ben, the grand old lady (the queen)

India- A congested road with dilapidated cars, honking at the cow insouciantly chewing cud and the humble stray dog resting on the sidelines.

Stereotypes and name association have confidently propagated such an image for the simple reason that it’s true. The more cosmopolitan among us would scream murder and try to disassociate themselves, while the “intellectuals” would propose wild Chindogus that are just that and the nonchalant would just sigh it away. The stray dog however has recently been the cause of a bit of black humour among these circles.

The recent opening of the Delhi Airport was a matter of National pride. The state-of-the-art facility was commended all over. Emirates was kind enough to send their big-boy jet -the A380 to mark the occasion. The new retractable ramp was waiting for its esteemed guest to dock while officials and the usual soiree of airs and accents were waiting to greet the dignitaries. However, the humble stray decided to make its appearance, delectably on the approach road to the ramp. What ensued was a comical ruckus of officials running around the dog, trying to shoo it away, while a hierarchy of screaming took place starting from the CEO to the groundskeepers.

Another pleasant appearance of the stray dog was when a bunch of officials for the Commonwealth Games discovered that their living areas were not exactly empty. It seems that the previous tenants ‘the strays’ were not given their appropriate notice periods. But as they were good upstanding Indian strays they heeded to the shooing away and moved out.

The reality that our thundering economy is not inclusive and our neglect of the little things would somehow wreak havoc on our grandiose plans seems to be symbolically represented in these scenes.

Are we responsible? - Part 2

“[God] is the greatest democrat the world knows, for he leaves us “unfettered” to make our own choice between evil and good, he is the greatest tyrant ever known, for he often dashes the cup from our lips and under cover of freewill leaves us a margin so wholly inadequate as to provide only mirth for himself at our expense…”- Mahatma Gandhi

In my last post I came to an abrupt ending about how God is responsible for everything and we couldn’t hold anybody accountable for their actions as they were pawns in a bigger and grander plan. The theory seemed plausible as it appealed to your abstract mind and it also went along with the delusions which we have come to accept, until I mentioned the serial killer and the paedophile. Suddenly, a Pandora’s Box opened, filled with emotions that engulfed the abstract mind refuting to qualify it.

Let’s revisit the issue again. We established the actual absence of freewill as our decisions would be based on our prejudices, genes, upbringing and many other variables, moreover, the options we choose from, is also not controlled by us leading us to believe there is some higher power that has authority over it.

Is that entirely true? If we look closer at each decision, we realise that the decision to choose between right or wrong still lies with us. If we can decide between right and wrong aren’t we then, partially responsible for our actions? I also talked about how each decision inadvertently becomes a factor for a future decision. Zooming out into a more macro view we can conclude that an eco-system then becomes responsible for its own actions.

Recent research has pointed out that religion and its offshoots were evolved as a necessity for the human race to survive because it set the rules for distinguishing right and wrong and also encouraged to work for the common good rather than for the ‘self’. The common good often included the good of the ecology too. Many civilizations have long perished (ecocide) as a punishment for ignoring the common good.

The question of God’s existence still remains unanswered. Everybody has to have delusions to keep them going, the more deluded they are, they more happier they seem to be, but don’t be deluded by our apparent inability to control the future

“Choose to believe never inherit it”

Are we responsible? - Part 1

Coming from work, you decide to have a chocolate tart. Upon checking your wallet, you find you have just enough for one from the deli down the road. You then walk up to it to find a social activist standing in front of it, asking you to donate money for a cause, in which you, incidentally, believe in strongly. You can either chose to buy the tart or put the money in the tin. The choice is completely up to you. It is your “freewill” to make a decision.

Consider this argument

(1) You do what you do — in the circumstances in which you find yourself—because of the way you then are.

(2) So if you’re going to be ultimately responsible for what you do, you’re going to have to be ultimately responsible for the way you are — at least in certain mental respects.

(3) But you can’t be ultimately responsible for the way you are in any respect at all.

(4) So you can’t be ultimately responsible for what you do.

You can’t be ultimately responsible for the way you are (mentally), because the genes you inherited and the past experiences you have been through, is not your doing. Therein lays the argument between freewill and determinism or in simpler terms, the argument between you deciding your own fate and God charting it out for you.

We believe that we are free to decide between choices. However the choices and the biases we have are the constraints that we can’t control. It’s determined by the billions of decisions made by the millions of creatures throughout time.

Let me elaborate that with the chocolate tart example, you must have felt hungry because you couldn’t eat anything with tea because you had a phone call from your client, who for some reason had decided to call at that particular moment when the tea trolley comes along. The chain could go on like that. The social activist guy decided to stand in front of the deli because of another chain of reasons. His choice of social cause to support is another chain and your inkling to that particular cause is another one (Example: The activist might be rooting to reduce cruelty against dogs because his girlfriend is into it and you might be inclined because you love dogs). There are many other chains of reasons like a cause and effect machine leading to that particular instance where you had to take a trivial decision.

The existence of freewill then becomes questionable. Mankind has attributed the job of determining the choices and creating our biases to God. This explained everything that humans couldn’t fathom and made our lives simpler.

Let’s try to bring some math into the discussion by attributing a variable to a decision. The value of the variable is inadvertently linked to the billions of decisions that led up to that particular decision. To buy the tart, donate the money, or just walk off, can be the most likely values for the chocolate tart problem. However, each decision has a probability component based on your past experiences and prejudices. We may argue that we are capable of taking rational decisions, but Freud came along and proposed that the unconscious has a bit more say in things than we perceived it to have. The existence of such a probability then definitively proves that “freewill” is a tad bit exaggerated.

Since freewill is out of the picture, then by default, God should win this argument hands down. He plans out the entire existence of nature and also makes us think that it was our own idea. Charles Baudelaire once mentioned "The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist”. So is God, the devil himself?

If the theory of god being responsible for everything holds water; that implicitly implies that we are not responsible for our actions. We just have to wait out this “menial” existence on earth, which will by any means, progress according to the master plan.

So the serial killer, the pedophile, even Judas all stand vindicated, as they were just pawns for something much more important.

“I believe in God, I just don’t like him”

This a two part essay.. The next part will be uploaded next week

Disconnect

Problem

• Research suggests that as compared with 410 million multi-dimensionally poor people resident in 26 of the poorest African countries there are as many as 421 million in just eight of the poorer Indian states (Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal)
• 46 per cent of the children in India are malnourished
• 10,688 lakh tonnes of foodgrains were found damaged in different FCI warehouses as on January 1, 2010
• India loses food grains worth Rs. 58,000 crore every year due to lack of storage facilities
• Food inflation has remained above the 16 per cent level for most part of the year
• India has been self sufficient in food grains since the 70s but still half of our population starve.

Reasons

• Lack of infrastructure especially inadequate storage facilities
• Public distribution system is fragmented and steeped in bureaucracy.
• Lack of a central distribution and utilisation plan.
• Movement of goods (transport through air, road, water, rail etc.) among the most inefficient in the world. 14% of our GDP is spent on logistics alone.
• Alleged existence of a private lobby that blocks PDS distribution to drive up prices

Sure, we may be

• Trying to go to the moon
• Trying for a permanent seat in the Security Council,
• A member of the “emerging countries” list
• Shipping aid to Africa and Afghanistan
• Having our own currency symbol, which some “experts” say, is a step towards becoming an important economic power
• Growing at an enviable 9%

It all just seems quite futile.

A Big Brain

Cogito Ergo Sum means ‘I think, therefore I exist (am)’. It answers the question of our existence of whether we exist or if we are characters in some chap’s wild imagination. Well now the question is- How do we think? What happens in our brilliant brains that makes us think?

Microprocessors,the brains of computers and smart devices; are made up of millions of components called transistors. Each one just makes one decision- to be in 0 or 1 state. Programmers, with help of complex algorithms employ many of these simple transistors simultaneously to create computing power.

Our brain is made up of 50-100 billion neurons connected together with 1000 trillion synaptic connections as in a microprocessor. If you take a single neuron, it doesn’t exhibit intelligence as such. When billions of them are connected together, something amazing happens- Intelligence.

Now let’s consider another network- the internet. An estimated 1.8 billion users are connected to this big web. Millions are getting hooked up every month. The advent of smart phones and cheap data rates are pushing these figures off the roof. Nowadays there are about 500-700 million transistors in a single processor. If we were to consider the trillions of transistors connected together through the internet, it does come very close to the number of neurons in our brains. Sure, the number of synapses is still very small, but wouldn’t it be enough for primary intelligence?

So the big question is, whether the internet is aware of its self? Can it think for itself? If so, by Cogito Ergo Sum, does it mean that it exists?

-This can be also explained by Swarm Intelligence, like how Craig Reynolds did with Boids to explain flocking behavior of birds-

‘80s

“I pity the fools who were born in the 80s”. Mr T would have said something like that. I bet a lot of people don’t know who Mr T is and that is exactly my point. I felt the first pang of the gender gap when I was talking to my little brother (now not-so-little). I was taken aback by his priorities, because he had them.

People born in the late 80s and the 90s( you can add 3 years to people who were bought up in villages) were exposed to a liberalized India, an India were western culture-aping was possible. This exposure, however small had a profound effect on the kids, they now had a clear direction to follow. The 80s guys are confused; they are stuck in a rut to either adhere to tradition or convention, to shake hands or to hug, Def Leppard or Lil Wayne.

This generation has a constant need of reaffirmation of their acts; they are torn between individualism and obligations. Their tryst with the ‘Culture of self’ has left them shocked and awed at the same time. They envy the people who accomplish that and condemn them for their lack of social sense.

Creating a positive anosognosia which suspends reality or rather becoming oblivious to it, to muster up a list of priorities and sticking to it seems to be the only way this generation can hope to cope.

Fickle

All the women who knew me well have complained that I am a hard hearted man and my allegiance lies with my family and nothing else. They also lament to the fact that I could not form a lasting relationship with anything albeit human or materialistic, it usually followed the lifetime of a fad. So, naturally, I didn’t have an idol, I didn’t have a favourite book, musician or car. I just changed it to suit my latest fad.

These fads are bought about by articles, books, movies, music and mostly images. Capturing a moment in time which can instil the whiffs of inspiration is truly magnificent. To me, it’s not the lighting or the tone of the image; it’s the characters the image tries to define. Here are some of those images

A clown trying to bring some cheer to children who lost their homes to the tropical storm Agatha  in Guatemala. Reminded me that there is goodness in people even in times of turmoil, rather than what Stephen King wants us to believe.

Resistance: An image from the Gaza strip, taught me that its resolve and not strength that matters. A similar image would be Tiananmen square, one which inspired a whole generation

This image represented reality- the shocking reality of malnourishment in India. It broke through the walls of my comfy cocoon and put into perspective the harsh but undeniable reailty.